🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not enact binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," stated a leading parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust data".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for children," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, regulation is largely unfolding at the regional government level due to country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain figures to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, additional states are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion continues, the steps of Australia and its followers show that policymakers around the world are less and less willing to wait for platforms to self-regulate.